Entrar
¿Nuevo usuario? Inscribirme
incredulos · Incredulos.
? ¿Ya estás suscrito? Entra a Yahoo!

Consejos

¿Sabías que...?
Podés cambiar el orden de los mensajes. Simplemente hacé clic en el enlace de columna fecha. Tus preferencias se guardarán, por lo tanto no necesitarás hacerlo otra vez cuando vuelvas a entrar.

Mensajes

  Mensajes Ayuda
Avanzado
Buenas noticias desde Japón (en inglés).   Lista de mensajes  
Responder | Reenviar Mensaje #19293 de 19531 |
Resumen: Un juez le saca la custodia a los padres de un bebe que le
negaban a que reciba transfución de sangre.
Aca está lo mas importante:
"The family court decided in about six or seven hours of deliberations
that the child´s welfare must take precedence over the parents´
beliefs and accepted the request to suspend their parental rights."

Court suspended parental rights for one day to save boy's life with transfusion

Sunday 15th March, 10:41 AM JST

TOKYO -

A court accepted on the same day a child consultation center´s request
to suspend the parental rights of a couple who refused to let their
son have a blood transfusion in 2008, enabling a hospital to save the
1-year-old boy´s life, according to sources close to the matter.

The couple rejected the hospital´s blood transfusion offer, citing
``religious reasons.´´ Notified by the hospital, the center filed the
request with the family court as it regarded the case, which took
place in eastern Japan, as one of ``medical neglect´`-a form of child
abuse.

Medical treatment for a child usually requires the approval of his or
her parents. In the past, the suspension of parental rights took about
a week for a case of medical neglect, but it is rare for a court to
give a judgment on the same day it accepted the request.

The latest case is an example of how the child consultation center,
the hospital and the family court cooperated in carrying forward legal
procedures to realize urgent medical treatment.

According to the sources, the boy suffered symptoms of shock and was
diagnosed with massive bleeding from the digestive tract due to
unknown causes.

The hospital notified the child consultation center that the boy´s
life was in danger, and around noon the following day the center asked
the family court to suspend the couple´s parental rights as a stopgap
measure until a conclusion on the matter had been reached.

The family court decided in about six or seven hours of deliberations
that the child´s welfare must take precedence over the parents´
beliefs and accepted the request to suspend their parental rights.

Following the decision, the hospital treated the boy and his life was
saved. The center later withdrew its request and the boy is now being
raised by his parents again.

--
Sebastián Bassi. Diplomado en Ciencia y Tecnología.

Non standard disclaimer: READ CAREFULLY. By reading this email,
you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all
obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED
agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap,
browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and
acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have
entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and
assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and
privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release
me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.



Lun, 16 de Mar, 2009 3:25 am

stm3
Sin conexión Sin conexión
Enviar correo Enviar correo

Reenviar Mensaje #19293 de 19531 |
Desplegar mensajes Autor Ordenar por fecha

Resumen: Un juez le saca la custodia a los padres de un bebe que le negaban a que reciba transfución de sangre. Aca está lo mas importante: "The family court...
Sebastian Bassi
stm3
Sin conexión Enviar correo
16 de Mar, 2009
3:25 am
Avanzado

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! de Argentina S.R.L. Todos los derechos reservados.
Política de privacidad - Condiciones del Servicio - Reglas de la comunidad de Yahoo! - Ayuda